A while back I wrote an article on this site talking about how running can be a great cardio exercise, but how there are so many exercise alternatives for people who don’t enjoy running (of which I am one).

Among alternative exercises that we listed:

• Doing a workout video
• Playing basketball
• Rowing machine
• Hiking on local trails
• Spin classes
• Stationary bike
• Roller Blading

The alternatives are really numerous and you’re really only limited by your creativity.   There are a ton of exercises out there for non-runners.

One of the alternatives that I didn’t list, but that truly can be great exercise, is golf.

Golf  Can Give Great Exercise

One thing a lot of people really don’t realize is that golfing can be great exercise.  I think people have an image in their heads of a bunch of old fat guys riding around in a cart and stopping off for drinks  and food at the clubhouse.  But the truth is that golf can help you to burn hundreds of calories.  Playing 18 holes of golf can be about the same as walking 3.5 to 6 miles!

Research conducted by Neil Wolkodoff of the Rose Center for Health and Sports Sciences in Denver found the following statistics:

Golfers who walk and carry their own bag burn 721 calories, golfers using a pull cart burn 718 calories, golfers walking with a caddie burn 613 calories and golfers riding in a golf cart burn 411 calories on average.

So if you carry your own bag and walk the course when you  play, you can burn in excess of 700 calories. That’s not too shabby!  Even those who rode a cart still burned more than 411 calories by golfing 18 holes.

Not only does golf give you some great exercise, it can prolong your life!  A Swedish study by the Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports and based on data from 300,000 golfers found that golfers have a a lower death rate than others:

The death rate for golfers is 40 percent lower than for other people of the same sex, age and socioeconomic status, which correspond to a 5 year increase in life expectancy. Golfers with a low handicap are the safest.

They found that those with a lower handicap – those who typically play more – had better health.  Also, because golfers tend to golf into old age, they will enjoy the health benefits for longer as well.  So start golfing and add years to your life!

Of course in order to enjoy the health benefits you have to be a regular golfer, and not a once every 3 months type golfer.

Conclusion

Golf is another great exercise alternative for those who don’t like to run, bike or do workout videos.  It will help you burn hundreds of calories while being low impact and doing something you enjoy (if you’re good enough and not hitting it into the sand traps!)

Next time you may think twice about taking your buddies up on those golf offers because you’re in fact improving your health and prolonging your life.   So go hit the links!

If you’re in a time crunch and want a simple but highly effective metabolism boosting fat loss workout that only takes 15 minutes to complete then this is right up your alley.

Give it a go and let me know how it works for you:

If you’re anything like me (a glutton for punishment) and love a good challenge then you’ll LOVE this workout. Or you’ll hate me altogether

WARNING: This isn’t easy and will push you to your limits physically and mentally.

If you’re still reading this then I haven’t done a good enough job of putting you off yet have I?

Ok, if you’re determined to go through with it then here ya go:

High Performance Lower Body THRASHER Workout

Good Luck and let me know how it goes

Running with knee pain is a common frustration for most runners especially when it’s unexplained and you can’t pin-point anything that might be causing it.

It’s no fun when you’re laid out on the couch with ice packs on your knees popping ibuprofen like it’s candy.

Unfortunately, most runners go through one failed attempt after another to eliminate the pain such as visits to the doctor, rest, ice, pain relievers or (in some cases) surgery.

So, why do these methods fail miserably to eliminate knee pain when running?

Because they’re focused on treating symptoms without addressing the actual cause of the problem.

Confused?

The video below will explain it so you can get back to pain free running:

• Squat Test: Hold the position in the photo below (WITHOUT THE BALL IN YOUR HANDS–just hold your arms in front of you) for 30 seconds and notice where you feel it the most (hint: it’s somewhere in your legs.. . Go as close to parallel as you can but don’t allow your hips to drop below your knees.

• Single Leg Test: Begin on one leg and try to touch an object about 6″ tall (like the cone shown in the photo) with control. Touch with your right hand and come back back up. Then on the same leg try it with your left hand and come back up. Repeat the test with both hands on the other leg as well.

Notice if you can do this without wobbling, if you can do it with some difficulty or if your other foot touches the floor at any time on the way down or up.
1)

2)

Ok, so now that you’ve completed the tests let’s go over what all of this has to do with knee pain from running:

Stay tuned for part 2 in this series where I’ll show you how to eliminate the cause of your running knee pain.

Leave me a comment below and let me know if this helped you.

Go HERE for 3 Steps To End Running With Knee Pain Forever Part 2

photo credit: mikebaird

The government released some new guidelines for physical activity this past week, telling us how much we need to exercise in order to maintain a healthy lifestyle and fend off problems like heart disease, stroke and diabetes. But what if you have other goals like buffing up, getting ready for a race or just slimming down?

MSNBC talked with fitness experts to get an idea of what kind of activity you’ll need to reach those goals. The first area they touched on – slimming down. So how much exercise do you need to drop a few pounds?

To lose significant weight and keep it off, many people will need more than 300 minutes a week of moderate activity, the guidelines note. Spread out over the course of a week, that amounts to at least an hour of exercise for five days, which is in line with other recommendations for weight control. If you’re sedentary, begin slowly and build up.

So it sounds like losing weight is no easy process, you’re going to have to put the time in and really make a goal and stick to it. 5 hours a week really isn’t that much, but it can be if you haven’t been working out at all.  Take it slow and work up to it- and you’ll get there.

What if you want to bulk up like a weightlifter or sport a sculpted bod at the beach?  Depending on what your goal is, you can expect to be exercising and doing strength training from 3-5 days a week:

If your goal is to look good in a swimsuit (toned but not overly pumped up), aim to strength train (using any available approach to overload the muscles, including free weights, machines and resistance bands) three to four times a week for 45 minutes to an hour each time, working all major muscle groups, Dawes says. Allow each muscle group to recover for at least 48 hours. You’ll also need to watch your diet and burn calories through cardio. Looking toned requires both boosting muscle and minimizing body fat.

If your goal is to sport a rock-hard bodybuilder bod, you’re in for some serious time in the gym – about five days a week, Dawes says. This can put you at risk for overuse injuries, so it’s a good idea to consult a personal trainer for advice on devising a safe routine that gives your muscles adequate recovery time.

How about if you’re training for a race? What kind of time input can you expect for that?

Not surprisingly, building aerobic endurance for competition in a 10K, marathon or triathlon requires much more effort than exercising to stay healthy.How much more? “It’s a continuum,” says James Pivarnik, president-elect of the American College of Sports Medicine and a professor of kinesiology and epidemiology at Michigan State University in East Lansing.

It all depends on where you start, Pivarnik explains. A hard workout for a mere mortal might actually decondition an elite athlete who’s accustomed to much more advanced training on most days of the week.

“If you want to get fitter today, you have to somehow overload where you are now,” he says, and then build on that program.

Comana recommends that people start off using the “talk test” to gauge how hard to push themselves. This means that you should be able to talk continuously for 30 seconds while exercising, he says. If you can’t, it’s too difficult. Build your program from three days a week to five, he recommends.

Whatever you’re doing, what’s most important is to make a commitment and get started today. The gains you’ll make will happen one day, and one rep at a time.  Good luck!

One thing that I’ve struggled with for some time is controlling my portion sizes when I eat. I tend to eat Goliath sized portions, fit for a giant.

One thing we’ve done at times in our house is to buy foods packaged in smaller portions. We buy the 100 calorie packs, smaller versions of candy bars for treats, etc. Our reasoning was that we were eating less and limiting our consumption of unhealthy foods. But what is the flipside – is it really all that beneficial?

I was just reading on the Chicago Tribune’s website an article about package sizes, and how it affects our consumption:

In theory, buying mini-packages of food should help us eat less.

But these cute little versions might actually have the opposite effect because it’s hard to limit consumption, according a study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

In fact, the belief that it will be easier to control your appetite with individually wrapped, single portions may backfire and increase consumption, according to researchers from Tilburg Unverisity in the Netherlands.

“When tempting products came in large package formats, consumers deliberated most before consumption, were least likely to consume, and consumed the least. This illustrates how small temptations can remain undetected (“flying under the radar”) and large package formats may reduce consumption as a result of the experienced self-control conflict,” they wrote.

Tempting products in smaller packages cost more, so in addition to eating more, we’re also more likely spending more money, the researchers added.

I wasn’t involved in the study, but I probably should have been. I haven’t purchased a regular-sized Reese’s Peanut Butter Cup in decades. But I think nothing of eating five to 10 miniature Reese’s at one sitting. (To relieve the guilt I hide the wrappers.)

Interesting, so buying smaller packages actually may backfire and cause increased consumption because of the decreased guilt factor.  We feel better about eating them because they’re smaller – but in the end we end up eating more anyway.

What do you think about this, have you experienced this in your own life?